Digital Pathology Podcast

Send us Fan Mail
What if the most frightening part of a pathology report is not the word cancer, but the silence that follows?
In this episode of the Digital Pathology Podcast, Dr. Aleksandra Zuraw talks with Michelle Mitchell—breast cancer survivor, caregiver, national patient advocate, and longtime volunteer across Michigan Medicine, ASCP, the Digital Pathology Association, and MyPathologyReport.ca—about what happened when she saw her own cancer slide years after treatment. That moment changed how she understood her disease, her risk, and her role as a patient advocate.
This is not just a patient story. It is a digital pathology implementation story.
The episode looks at how digital pathology removes practical barriers to sharing slides, why pathology clinics matter, and what becomes possible when pathologists move from being hidden in the background to becoming direct contributors to patient understanding. Michelle and Dr. Aleks talk through the communication gap around pathology reports, the emotional cost of delayed explanation, and the real-world workflow of pathology clinic visits built to help patients review their slides with the pathologist who made the diagnosis.
They also discuss what the 21st Century Cures Act changed for patients, why immediate access to reports without interpretation can still create fear, and how pathology clinics can bridge the gap between raw data and real understanding. The conversation gets practical too: how patients can request a pathology clinic visit, what virtual pathology consults can look like, how billing and workflow concerns are already being addressed, and why the infrastructure question is smaller than many people assume.
If you work in digital pathology, pathology informatics, patient communication, or implementation, this episode is a reminder that visibility is not extra. It is part of the value proposition. And for pathologists who worry this is too far outside the traditional role, the episode offers a grounded counterpoint: the workflows, templates, billing structures, and virtual options already exist.
Highlights
00:00 – Why pathology needs to become more patient-centered
Michelle frames the core problem clearly: what often scares patients is not only cancer, but the silence around the diagnosis. 
00:34 – How digital pathology changes the patient experience
Digital slides make it possible for patients to see their diagnosis, compare normal and abnormal tissue, and ask better questions. 
11:13 – What happened when Michelle saw her cancer for the first time
More than a decade after treatment, seeing her own slide changed how she understood her grade, her risk, and her daily health decisions. 
16:19 – Why visual pathology can change adherence and lifestyle
Michelle explains how the image-based explanation became a practical turning point, not just an emotional one. 
20:43 – The case for direct pathologist-patient communication
The episode reviews why this can improve clarity, treatment understanding, clinic efficiency, and even professional satisfaction for pathologists. 
38:40 – What a pathology clinic actually looks like
From preparation and consent to slide review, plain language, empathy, and follow-up, the workflow is much more concrete than many people assume. 
45:35 – ASCP’s certification workshop for pathology clinics
Michelle describes the national effort to make pathology clinics reproducible, scalable, and easier to implement. 
49:32 – What the 21st Century Cures Act changed
Patients now get near real-time access to reports, but that access still needs interpretation, context, and support. 
01:03:23 – Pushback, logistics, and why the barriers are not where people think
Time, reimbursement, scheduling, and virtual setup are addressed directly with examples already in practice. 
01:16:57 – The future: patient-friendly reports, AI, and pathology as part of the care team
The episode closes on a practical vision: not hype, but tools and workflows that already exist and can be connected now. 
Resources mentioned
Digital Pathology Place – website and educational platform referenced by Dr. Aleks as the home for her work and resources. 
Digital Pathology 101 – Dr. Aleks’s book, referenced in the broader discussion of patient and pathologist education. 
Michigan Medicine breast pathology clinic – launched in 2023 as a patient-facing breast pathology clinic model. 
ASCP pathology clinic certification workshop – national workshop co-developed to help institutions build pathology clinics. 
21st Century Cures Act – legal framework behind near real-time patient access to pathology reports and related health data. 
MyPathologyReport.ca – patient-friendly pathology education resource reviewed with patient advocate involvement. 
American Cancer Society Reach to Recovery – support resource mentioned for breast cancer patients. 
Scanslated – patient-friendly report interface discussed as part of a future-facing model for pathology communication. 
Virtual pathology consults/telehealth setup – discussed as a scalable way to lower implementation friction.
Support the show
Get the "Digital Pathology 101" FREE E-book and join us!

Send us Fan Mail
DigiPath Digest #45 asks a practical question: can AI in pathology move from correlation to real clinical use? In this episode, I review four papers that push on that question from different angles: computational pathology moving toward morphology-driven molecular inference, the current state of digital cytopathology and AI, multi-omics and precision oncology in hepatocellular carcinoma, and AI literacy in veterinary education. What ties them together is not model performance alone. It is the harder question of validation, workflow fit, quantitative use, ethics, and human oversight.
In the first paper, I talk about computational pathology as more than pattern recognition. The focus is on morphology-driven molecular inference, digital biomarkers, and why spatial omics matters as biological ground truth. I also discuss why continuous quantitative scoring is more useful than forcing biology into rough scoring buckets. 
The second paper focuses on digital cytopathology. Cytology was early for FDA-cleared AI in cervical screening, but non-gynecologic cytology is still much harder to digitize because of specimen variability and workflow complexity. I also cover telecytology, rapid onsite evaluation, automation, and quality control. 
The third paper looks at hepatocellular carcinoma and AI-driven precision oncology. This part is about using AI and machine learning to integrate genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, radiomics, and pathology to support biomarker discovery, tumor microenvironment analysis, and treatment stratification. 
The fourth paper may be the most broadly useful. It proposes an AI literacy curriculum for veterinary education that covers AI fundamentals, machine learning evaluation, LLMs, ethics, liability, and academic integrity. I think that matters far beyond veterinary medicine, because if clinicians are expected to use AI tools responsibly, AI literacy cannot stay optional. 
Highlights
00:01 Welcome and overview of the four papers
03:02 Computational pathology and morphology-driven molecular inference
11:01 Digital cytopathology, telecytology, and QC
20:47 AI/ML in hepatocellular carcinoma precision oncology
31:04 AI literacy in veterinary education
47:42 Final takeaways and Digital Pathology 101 update 
Resources
Computational Pathology as a Mechanistic Discipline: From Morphology to Molecular Data
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42052846/

Advances in Digital Cytopathology and Artificial Intelligence Applications
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42046894/

Navigating the Labyrinth of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Leveraging AI/ML for Precision Oncology
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42065059/

Curriculum Framework for Artificial Intelligence Literacy in Veterinary Education
Front Vet Sci. 2026;13:1801756 
Support the show
Get the "Digital Pathology 101" FREE E-book and join us!

Send us Fan Mail
Where is AI in pathology actually becoming useful right now? In this episode of DigiPath Digest, I review 4 new PubMed papers across digital pathology, whole slide imaging (WSI), computational pathology, medical education, forensic pathology, and breast cancer AI. We look at a deep learning tool for coronary artery stenosis measurement in forensic autopsies, an AI-powered digital pathology model for renal pathology education, an open-source quality control tool for prostate biopsy whole slide images, and a breast cancer stage prediction model built for resource-constrained settings using low-magnification H&E slides. I also share updates on the upcoming second edition of Digital Pathology 101 and the decision to make AI paper summaries public on the podcast feed to help busy pathology professionals stay current. 
Highlights
 
[01:28] Update on the upcoming second edition of Digital Pathology 101 and the release of public AI paper summaries for faster literature review. 

[05:22] Paper 1: Deep learning for coronary artery stenosis evaluation in forensic autopsies using whole slide imaging. Why objective stenosis measurement matters, how the model outperformed visual estimates, and why this could affect adoption in forensic pathology.

[15:18] Paper 2: AI-powered digital pathology with case-based teaching in renal education. A practical discussion on annotated digital slides, flipped classroom learning, and how digital pathology can improve pathology education and diagnostic reasoning.

[21:34] Paper 3: Open-source AI for quantitative quality control in prostate biopsy whole slide images. Why WSI quality control matters, what PathProfiler measures, and how automated QC can support remote pathology workflows.

[32:38] Paper 4: Breast cancer stage prediction from H&E whole slide images in resource-constrained settings. A look at low-magnification AI, vision transformers, and what moderate performance can still mean when access to advanced testing is limited. 

[45:06] Closing thoughts, invitation to vote for future AI paper summaries, and a final reminder to download Digital Pathology 101. 
Resources
Paper 1: Development of a deep learning-based tool for coronary artery stenosis evaluation in forensic autopsies using whole slide imaging
PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41998396/

Paper 2: Integrating AI-Powered Digital Pathology With Case-Based Teaching: A Novel Paradigm for Renal Education in Medical School
PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41995002/

Paper 3: Application of an open-source AI tool for quantitative quality control in whole slide images of prostate needle core biopsies - a retrospective study
PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41994924/

Paper 4: Deep-learning-based breast cancer stage prediction from H&E-stained whole-slide images in resource-constrained settings
PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41993946/

Support the show
Get the "Digital Pathology 101" FREE E-book and join us!

Send us Fan Mail
Paper Discussed in this Episode:
Deep-learning-based breast cancer stage prediction from H&E-stained whole-slide images in resource-constrained settings. Bedőházi Z, Biricz A, Kilim O, et al. Journal of Pathology Informatics 21 (2026) 100644.
Episode Summary:
Welcome back, Trailblazers! In this Journal Club deep dive of the Digital Pathology Podcast, we flip the core assumption of microscopic precision on its head. Can an AI accurately predict pathological breast cancer stages (pTNM I-III) from a blurry, high-altitude 2.5x magnification snapshot? We explore a 2026 study that strips away standard high-resolution data to build a highly efficient, resource-aware AI diagnostic tool for clinics lacking supercomputers. We unpack the math, the models, and a haunting revelation about what primary tumors can tell us about distant metastasis.
In This Episode, We Cover:
• The Compute Bottleneck: Why the digital pathology AI revolution is leaving resource-constrained clinics behind, and how dropping from the standard 40x to 2.5x magnification slashes image patch extraction by 256 times, bypassing massive hardware and server requirements.
• The "Airplane View": How the AI compensates for the loss of microscopic cellular details (like mitosis or cellular atypia) by relying on macroscopic features, identifying disease through overall tumor growth patterns and broad architectural disruption.
• Vision Transformers & "Puzzle Bags": Why the UNI foundation model—a vision transformer fine-tuned on the BRACS dataset—outperforms older convolutional networks (like ResNet-50) by mapping long-range spatial dependencies across the entire image patch simultaneously. Plus, how Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) acts as a targeted "puzzle bag," mathematically weighting critical cancer data and ignoring irrelevant background noise.
• The Real-World Stress Test: The model's solid performance on the internal Semmelweis dataset versus the massive external Nightingale cohort, where unsupervised data cleaning with t-SNE and DBSCAN clustering automatically deleted garbage data. We also discuss the AI's struggle with the TCGA-BRCA dataset due to severe domain shift from heterogeneous tissue preparation, specifically the structural tissue damage caused by frozen sections.
• The "Messy Middle" and Clinical Triage: The model's tendency to struggle with Stage II breast cancer and the critical clinical danger of under-staging advanced Stage III cancers. We discuss why this WSI-only baseline isn't replacing human pathologists, but rather serves as an automated "sorting hat" for incomplete medical records or a highly tunable "smoke detector" to route suspicious slides for immediate manual review.
Key Takeaway:
The AI successfully predicted overall cancer stage—which inherently includes distant lymph node metastasis—by looking only at the primary tumor's architectural disruption, without ever evaluating a single lymph node slide. This proves that vital systemic biological secrets are hiding in plain sight in the macroscopic view of standard H&E slides, offering a phenomenal proof-of-concept for global health equity in resource-constrained settings
Support the show
Get the "Digital Pathology 101" FREE E-book and join us!

Send us Fan Mail
Paper Discussed in this Episode:
Integrating AI-Powered Digital Pathology With Case-Based Teaching: A Novel Paradigm for Renal Education in Medical School. Zhou H, Cui L. Clin Teach 2026; 23(3):e70421. doi: 10.1111/tct.70421.
Episode Summary: In this journal club episode tailored for healthcare trailblazers, we explore a massive paradigm shift in medical education. We examine a 2026 perspective article that uses the notoriously complex field of renal pathology as a stress test for a brand-new teaching model. Moving away from dark lecture halls and static, perfect images, we discuss what happens when artificial intelligence is actively combined with flipped classrooms, fundamentally redefining what it means to be a competent physician in the digital age.
In This Episode, We Cover:
• The "Bottleneck" of Renal Pathology: Why the kidney is the ultimate teaching hurdle. Students must translate the dense, flattened 2D reality of an H&E stain into an understanding of a patient's complex systemic autoimmune response.
• The Danger of the "Curated Reality": Why traditional teaching methods that rely on textbook-perfect, heavily curated slides create "brittle" mental models. When students finally encounter messy, real-world biopsies with overlapping, ambiguous pathologies, the traditional educational foundation falls apart.
• The "Spell Checker" for Histopathology: How collaborative AI elevates Whole Slide Imaging (WSI) beyond just high-resolution screens. The AI acts as a concurrent guide, using pixel-level pattern recognition to highlight regions of interest simultaneously and simulate the complex reasoning process of an expert pathologist.
• The Case-Based Flipped Classroom (CBFC): The pedagogical engine that anchors these AI tools in clinical reality. Instead of passive lectures, students are handed the "detective's case file" beforehand to actively interrogate annotated slides, synthesizing diverse data streams to defend diagnoses in collaborative groups.
• Redefining Medical Competence (The "Clinical Editor"): Why the new bottleneck in medical education isn't memorization—it's critical appraisal. We discuss the necessity of teaching "digital literacy," training students to skeptically manage AI, recognize its blind spots (like confusing a physical tissue fold for an abnormality), and actively audit the algorithm against the messy human reality of the patient.
• The Impending Culture Collision: A look at the fascinating future where freshly minted, AI-native residents enter a legacy clinical workforce still transitioning away from physical glass slides, potentially reversing traditional medical hierarchies in the hospital.
Key Takeaway: The goal of modern medical education is no longer just memorizing histological patterns, as that heavy lifting is being outsourced to algorithms. By fusing AI-powered digital pathology with the necessary friction of case-based learning, we are training a new generation of diagnosticians to view AI not as a crutch, but as a powerful collaborative tool that must be thoughtfully scrutinized and audited for safe patient care
Support the show
Get the "Digital Pathology 101" FREE E-book and join us!