The Marketing Architects

Welcome to Nerd Alert, a series of special episodes bridging the gap between marketing academia and practitioners. We're breaking down highly involved, complex research into plain language and takeaways any marketer can use. 

In this episode, Elena and Rob examine why advertising consistently underperforms with consumers over 60 and find the answer has less to do with older brains and more to do with where marketers are pointing their media budgets. 

Topics covered: 
[00:02:00] "Differences in Advertising Effectiveness Across Age Groups
[00:03:00] How researchers measured mental availability across 1,500 
[00:04:00] The associative penetration gap between age groups
[00:07:00] How the purchase funnel narrows sharply at 60-plus
[00:08:00] Why newer product categories widen the confidence gap
[00:10:00] Three practical takeaways for reaching older audiences 

To learn more, visit marketingarchitects.com/podcast 

Resources:  

Mecredy, P., Stocchi, L., & Feetham, P. (2025). Differences in advertising's effectiveness across age groups. International Journal of Advertising, 44(2), 235–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2024.2370678 

Get more research-backed marketing strategies by subscribing to The Marketing Architects on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

Concern about short-termism among marketers jumped from 25% in 2022 to 55% in 2025. Budget allocation barely moved. The funnel may not be dead, but it might be damaging your brand.

This week, Elena, Angela, and Rob debate whether the marketing funnel still belongs in the boardroom. They unpack why the funnel persists despite strong evidence against it, how ad platforms reinforce flawed thinking for commercial reasons, and what alternatives actually work. 

Topics covered:
•    [01:00] Marketing Week article on why funnel reinvention is backfiring
•    [02:00] The funnel as a mental shortcut vs. a map of how people buy
•    [05:00] How ad platforms built funnel logic into their products for commercial reasons
•    [07:00] Categories where the funnel fits (and where it falls apart)
•    [11:00] The say-do gap: marketers believe in brand investment but budgets barely moved
•    [15:00] Tom Roach's alternative: building, nudging, and connecting
•    [18:00] How to plan media without the funnel
•    [20:00] What great creative looks like when you stop thinking in funnel stages

To learn more, visit marketingarchitects.com/podcast or subscribe to our newsletter at
marketingarchitects.com/newsletter.

Resources:
2025 Marketing Week Article: https://www.marketingweek.com/reality-check-funnel-reinvent/

Google Messy Middle Research: https://business.google.com/us/think/consumer-insights/navigating-purchase-behavior-and-decision-making/

WARC Multiplier Effect Report: https://page.warc.com/the-multiplier-effect-report

Thinkbox Profitability 2 Report: https://www.thinkbox.tv/profitability2

Get more research-backed marketing strategies by subscribing to The Marketing Architects on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

Welcome to Nerd Alert, a series of special episodes bridging the gap between marketing academia and practitioners. We're breaking down highly involved, complex research into plain language and takeaways any marketer can use.

In this episode, Elena and Rob explore why consumers sometimes turn on brands after an acquisition, even when the product hasn't changed, and what marketers can do to soften the blow.

Topics covered:[02:05] "When and Why Consumers React Negatively to Brand Acquisitions: A Values Authenticity Account"
[03:00] What is values authenticity, and why does it matter?
[04:05] Why the underdog effect isn't the real culprit
[04:40] How a 15% stake can start eroding consumer trust
[05:55] Five factors that can reduce acquisition backlash
[06:55] What competing brand equities mean for marketers

To learn more, visit marketingarchitects.com/podcast

Resources: Biraglia, A., Fuchs, C., Maira, E., & Puntoni, S. (2023). When and why consumers react negatively to brand acquisitions: A values authenticity account. Journal of Marketing, 87(4), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429221137817

Get more research-backed marketing strategies by subscribing to The Marketing Architects on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

95% of senior marketing leaders are already using or planning to use synthetic data within 12 months. So why are so many marketers still on the fence?

In this episode, Elena, Angela, and Rob talk with Peter Weinberg, co-founder of Evidenza and former head of research at LinkedIn’s B2B Institute. They discuss where to start with synthetic audiences, how to assess accuracy, and why brand building still matters as AI changes how people search and decide.

Topics covered:
•    [00:00] Introductions and what synthetic research actually is
•    [03:00] Why 95% of marketing leaders plan to use synthetic data within 12 months
•    [05:00] Synthetic research really replaces ignorance, not traditional surveys
•    [09:00] How to evaluate accuracy in synthetic research tools
•    [10:30] Where marketers should start: find the white spaces first
•    [16:00] Why AI can be creative and what 'temperature' means for marketers
•    [24:00] Why brand still matters in an AI-driven search world
•    [28:00] How Evidenza applied Ehrenberg-Bass principles to build their own brand
•    [34:00] Why more real-time data can lead to worse decisions

To learn more, visit marketingarchitects.com/podcast or subscribe to our newsletter at marketingarchitects.com/newsletter.

Resources:
2025 Qualtrics Article: https://www.qualtrics.com/articles/strategy-research/synthetic-research-breakthrough/

Peter's LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/weinbergpeter/

Get more research-backed marketing strategies by subscribing to The Marketing Architects on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

Welcome to Nerd Alert, a series of special episodes bridging the gap between marketing academia and practitioners. We're breaking down highly involved, complex research into plain language and takeaways any marketer can use.

In this episode, Elena and Rob explore the first large-scale benchmarking study of distinctive brand assets, and the results challenge some long-held assumptions about which assets actually stick in consumer memory.

Topics covered:[01:35] "Shape-Based Assets Are Strongest: Benchmarking Distinctive Brand Asset Performance Across Industries"
[02:55] What is a distinctive brand asset?
[03:30] Fame vs. uniqueness: the two dimensions of distinctiveness
[04:15] Why color is the weakest asset type
[05:35] The bizarreness effect
[06:00] When narrative assets outperform visual ones

To learn more, visit marketingarchitects.com/podcast

Resources: Phua, P., Bali, L., Anesbury, Z., & Sharp, B. (2026). Shape-based assets are strongest: Benchmarking distinctive brand asset performance across industries. International Journal of Advertising. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2026.2637295

Get more research-backed marketing strategies by subscribing to The Marketing Architects on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts.