Powered by RND
PodcastsArteUnpolished Watches

Unpolished Watches

Unpolished
Unpolished Watches
Último episodio

Episodios disponibles

5 de 7
  • Why do collectors have such a fetish for 'firsts'?
    Hello everyone. Like last week, today’s grab bag is also available as an audio issue. Listen above or find it on Spotify / Apple / RSS. It’s coming a little later because I saw Doechii on the first night of her Swap Tour here in Chicago. She’s awesome. In today’s newsletter: Two ideas for indie watchmakers, when watch design changes behavior, why collectors have such a fetish for “firsts,” my favorite watch from Monaco Legend’s auction this weekend, and how to get banned. To get all of Unpolished’s best takes, become a paid subscriber for $9/mo or $99/year:AHCI at 40. The AHCI (Académie Horlogère des Créateurs Indépendants) is a non-profit of independent watchmakers founded by Vicent Calabrese and Svend Andersen in 1985. To mark its 40th anniversary, Europa Star ran a great roundtable with 12 of its members, including FP Journe, Philippe Dufour, and the newest, Shona Taine. Interest in indies is still hot, but nowadays watchmakers also have all kinds of opportunities to showcase their work on Instagram or wherever else, and AHCI is looking for ways to stay relevant as an arbiter of real independence. Journe was particularly outspoken, offering two ideas: * 🥇 Grand Prix de l’Academie Awards: This takes the idea of the GPHG, Louis Vuitton Watch Prize, or Cartier Prize for Watchmaking and flips it on its head. Journe suggests the Academy awards and recognizes large brands for achievements in watchmaking. He says that brands might sheepishly accept these awards, but would be delighted by the recognition. “We need to put the Academy back at the summit and reward industrial brands when they do a good job,” Journe adds. * 🦭 Poinçon de l’Academie: Riffing on the Geneva Seal or Qualité Fleurier, Journe suggests a certification for watches that meet criteria set forth by the Academy. For example, to be an Academy member, a watchmaker has to personally develop and make at least 60% of their watch.They’re both good ideas. (1) Maybe the best marketing the Lange Datograph ever got was when we learned Philippe Dufour wears the pink gold version—it’s even called the Dufourgraph. (2) And an Academy Seal could bring some clarity or transparency around who’s actually doing what (or not) in the world of indies. Of course, there’s the old adage that “when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure,” so the exact parameters of such a seal would need to be carefully considered, but AHCI’s got the minds for that. Here’s the entire discussion with Europa Star.💭 When watch design changes your behavior. Jason Fried is a tech founder and also well-known as a watch collector. He recently wrote about when design drives behavior. Sometimes, design is what something looks like; sometimes, it’s how something works. But, Jason says, the most interesting designs change your behavior. Take the Lange 1’s power reserve: Its 72-hour power reserve isn’t linear. It takes just one day for the indicator to hit roughly the halfway point. This makes it seem like the mainspring is unwinding faster, encouraging its owner to wind the watch more frequently. That means it’s less likely to run out of power or hit the low end of its power reserve when watches are typically less accurate. Are there other examples of watch designs that actually change your behavior? The power reserve on the FP Journe Chronometre Souverain might be similar: It’s inverted to show “hours since last wind,” a nod to old marine chronometers and perhaps a subtle nudge to its wearer.PRESENTED BY THE COCONUT GROVE WATCH & JEWELRY SHOWThe inaugural Coconut Grove Jewelry & Watch Show, taking place November 14-16, 2025, at The Hangar at Regatta Harbor, will feature a global roster of renowned antique, vintage, and estate dealers. It’s organized by the same folks who put on the Original Miami Beach Antique Show, one of my favorite shows every year. Join fellow watch enthusiasts and uncover exceptional and rare vintage and estate watches that can’t be found anywhere else. This three-day shopping event is your invitation to indulge!For complimentary tickets, register today and use promo code UNPOLISHED:The Fetish for ‘Firsts’The other day, I was listening to one of my favorite watch podcasts, Hairspring, minding my own business and enjoying the nice fall weather. The two hosts were discussing the large and increasing premium between a first and third series Patek 3940 perpetual calendar, and then I heard myself being put on blast!See, I’d reached out to my buddy Erik of Hairspring for quotes for a GQ article a few months back. Erik gave some extremely wise thoughts that didn’t fit into that silly GQ pitch, but I’d been sitting on them to include in a future newsletter instead.They were addressing the question of whether the premium is justified on a first series 3940 that sells for, say $120k, and a later third series that sells for half that. Here’s what Erik told me a couple of months ago:“There are always the ‘special’ variants of storied references, and I believe most newer collectors undervalue them. For example, if you’re looking to buy a Patek 3940, you can get a third series for $60k. Or, go all the way to a Beyer first series where the most recent result was CHF 292k in 2023. Newer collectors look at that delta and think, ‘a small change in color and signature can’t possible justify a 5x value?’ The logical fail I see often is newer collectors anticipating that others will think this way too, and so eventually the normal variants have to catch up, right? This is almost never the case if you study prior examples. The value of the first series continues to climb at a rate much faster, and much further away from the third series. And there’s a whole section of buyers who only consider the most special or rare version of any given watch and are willing to pay what it takes to acquire one. That premium is unintuitive, but across Patek Philippe, Rolex, and nearly everywhere, it multiplies over time rather than evening out.” He’s right: There’s basically an entire segment of collectors who only want the “best” or the first or something. This has been very obvious with the Patek 3940 and 3970 the past couple of years, where prices for early examples have grown much faster than on later series. It’s the same for A-Series AP Royal Oaks, brass Journes, or closed-caseback Lange 1s. But it usually takes time for collectors to make these distinctions. In fact, if you use my market cap analysis, I might argue that early series 3970s/40s are still undervalued.To take another example, the market is learning to value “Pre-A” or “Pre-Series” Breguet watches from the 80s at a premium. These are watches from before 1987 when Breguet introduced serial numbers ending in letters (A, B, C, etc.), and watchmaker Daniel Roth was still with the brand. It makes these Pre-A watches historically important for Breguet enthusiasts, not to mention rarer. In our conversation about neo-vintage watches, Ben Dunn mentioned that the market isn’t always as sophisticated at making these distinctions. It makes sense: Breguet is a much smaller, niche concern than Patek Philippe. But I always caution against pursuing rarity for its own sake. Eventually, it has to come back to the watches. The dial of a first series 3940 just looks a lot different than a later one. The subdials were hand-carved and harder to produce. This means production is much lower, but if you look at them, you’ll also understand: a first series 3940 still has vestiges of handmade watchmaking. And if the market asks for a huge premium between two things, and you really, truly, just don’t get it? You might be able to save yourself some money. But remember:The Roundup* Notes on Monaco Legend’s auction this weekend. Here’s the catalog, usually the most fun curation for those who love to peruse vintage. The glossy black dial Rolex 6238 is perhaps my favorite watch of all time. You’ll find 6238s with glossy or matte dials, but the early glossy ones are something. This one’s not perfect—MLG calls its slight spotting a “stardust effect,” but it’s special (Lot 84, est. €200–400k). For those who claim to love shapes, how about this Baume & Mercier car watch? With Swiss tariffs still in place, it’ll be interesting to watch the auction season, and to what extent American bidders stay on the sidelines (I’d bet a lot…). I also really like this multiscale Vacheron 4072 chronograph that Andrea Parmigiani showed off as “his” a couple of years ago. * Pre-owned is The Story. Brands and retailers both want in, all because it’s how customers, especially young customers, shop now. According to the annual Deloitte Swiss watch industry report, 40% of Millennials or Gen Z plan to buy a pre-owned watch next year, and the main reason is because they’re cheaper. Here’s the full Deloitte report:* How the Swiss Army Knife is dealing with tariffs. “It’s a Swiss icon that is inseparably tied to the promise of ‘Made in Switzerland’ quality,” Carl Elsener, CEO of Victorinox, said. “Moving its production abroad would undermine the very essence of our brand.” (NY Times)* Rolex filed a trademark for Padellone, the collector-given nickname for its vintage triple calendar moonphase ref. 8171, Italian for frying pan. I’m not sure how I feel about brands claiming IP ownership over collector-created terms, but it’s most likely a move to protect a word associated with the brand for future heritage-driven marketing or campaigns. * A look at Mark Cho’s watch collection. One of my favorite people to listen to talk about watches and collecting. (Swiss Watch Gang)* Um, Benrus sent around this new AI ad. Yikes. * Remember that antitrust case against Hermes for its Birkin bag allocation? It was dismissed. “It may be, as the plaintiffs suggest, that Hermès reserves the Birkin bag for its highest-paying customers, but that in itself is not an antitrust violation,” the judge wrote. It’s since been appealed, but for now, a small win for luxury brands that thrive on exclusivity. * Ikea put all its old catalogs online. Watch brands should do this. Finally, I haven’t felt a need to have a terms of service beyond Substack’s standard policy, but the comments from last weekend’s Berneron review illustrate what I’d consider a violation. If you say someone has a “character flaw” or call people liars, among other things, you’ll get banned for at least a month. But I thought this went without saying! I’ll be back in your inbox with a podcast interview later this week. Get in touch:* [email protected]* Instagram* Tap the heart or leave a comment to let me know what you liked or didn’t. Seriously, it helps make Unpolished better. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.unpolishedwatches.com/subscribe
    --------  
    16:05
  • Microbrands, Frankenwatches, and What Even Is a Vintage Watch? | Q&A
    Good morning from New York, where I’m filming a “Masterclass” for Teddy Baldassarre’s updated website. In today’s newsletter: My complicated feelings on microbrands; vintage and modern (and the myth of ‘vintage’); GMTs under $30k, and more from last month’s Q&A. 🎧 I tried something new: This week’s Q&A is also available as an audio issue. It feels like a format that naturally lends itself to audio. Listen above or find it on Spotify / Apple / RSS. Let me know if you like the format, and I’ll think about using it for future newsletters. 📚 I’ve mentioned before that Rebecca Struthers’ Hand of Time is one of my favorite books about watchmaking. She recently published About Time, a children’s book on the history and science of time (ages 7–11). Dr. Struthers’ co-author is a physics teacher, and they’ve managed to make a complicated subject approachable and fun. Great for kids, and while, like me, you might be outside the recommended age range for this book, you’re certainly not above it. Also great to keep in mind as the holidays approach. Amazon | From the publisher. ICYMIQ: What are your thoughts on every microbrand coming onto the market? What space do these microbrands fill, and do you think these brands will survive such a harsh and competitive market? –RonA bit of a leading question, but it accurately captures my complicated feelings about many small or microbrands (not unlike my feelings about Watches & Wonders). I like many of their watches and have bought more than my share. That said, there are also a lot, perhaps too many, and I struggle with the fact that they’re often bringing together existing suppliers and components in different ways. No doubt, many of these microbrands do this while offering interesting designs or a unique perspective (Brew, Studio Underd0g). Some have even used this as a stepping stone to developing more interesting or complicated watches (Ming, Furlan Marri). Hell, Nomos started off using Peseux 7001s. The line between microbrand and independent is also increasingly blurred. Still, I appreciate watches for their enduring quality, and wonder if some of these microbrands will live up to that standard. I wonder how many brands at the typical microbrand-focused show will be around for the next one. Watches used to feel like this escape from the fast consumerism we see in so many other categories, but no longer. But perhaps this also gives established brands too much credit?? I’ve bought a handful of these watches. Honestly, the only one that’s really stuck is an Oak & Oscar, and that’s largely because I feel a personal connection to O&O as a local Chicago brand I’ve followed for most of its existence. Which gets to another reason why there are so many microbrands: We develop these personal connections for all kinds of different and perfectly valid reasons. Global supply chains and the internet make it a pretty viable business, and perhaps that’s just fine.Q: I’m trying to add a GMT/dual time/world time to the collection, but struggling to find the right piece. Don’t want Rolex, but want something wearable that I can actually travel with and feel safe, new or vintage is fine, just not the same old GMT-Master. $30k budget. –MarcI like the Parmigiani Tonda PF GMT Rattrapante at pre-owned prices right now (~$20k), a really subtle and different take on the GMT that’s easy to use. To me, the platonic ideal of a “travel time” doesn’t need to be taken off and set as you’re taxing on the runway. The 90s Royal Oak Dual Times (the original ref. 25730ST) should also slip in right under the budget—midsize proportions (36x8mm!) and practical complication, there’s nothing like it in the modern Audemars Piguet catalog. AP produced the Dual Time throughout the 90s, starting with the old-school tapisserie pattern but eventually transitioning to grand tapisserie. It later added a larger 39mm, though I’m not sure if a Royal Oak is “safe,” depending on what you meant by that. The modern Vacheron Constantin Overseas Dual Time is also cool. The Lange 1 Time Zone, first introduced in 2005 and updated in 2020, is a bit larger, but an awesome watch on the secondary.I’ll also add, and to further complicate my previous answer: If you just want to experiment, some microbrands do cool GMTs for cheap since flyer GMT movements have become so accessible: Lorier, Lorca, and Nodus come to mind. And of course, we have to mention the Nomos Club Sport World Timer again ($5k), now with three new colors: PRESENTED BY THE COCONUT GROVE WATCH & JEWELRY SHOWThe inaugural Coconut Grove Jewelry & Watch Show, taking place November 14-16, 2025, at The Hangar at Regatta Harbor, will feature a global roster of world renowned antique, vintage and estate dealers. Join fellow watch enthusiasts and uncover exceptional and rare vintage and estate watches that cannot be sourced anywhere else. This three-day shopping event is your invitation to indulge!For complimentary tickets, register today and use promo code UNPOLISHED:Q: I have more of a philosophical thought: We hear so much about the soul and beauty of vintage and the sterility of modern timepieces. Your most recent interview [with Ben Dunn] is a good example of this. But what is now vintage used to be modern. And what is now modern will someday be vintage. What are your thoughts about the progression of modern watches to vintage? –EricQ: What is your view on people only talking about mainly 60s–70s watches when it comes to vintage? Should someone who, for instance, collects TAG Heuers from the early 2000s be accepted as a vintage collector in the same way as someone who has Heuers from the 60s? –PatrickIt’s interesting to see how watches from the 1980s–2000s are now treated more like “true” vintage watches, with an emphasis on condition, originality, and other attributes important to collectors. This also means how we think about servicing them (or not), as what becomes more important isn’t the watch’s performance, but its condition and originality.There’s this commonly parroted myth that vintage comes from the French for 20 (vingt). It’s not true, but provides a useful rule of thumb, even if I think the definition is more fluid and varies by brand.For example, Rolex is the easiest as its modern era sees the advent of five-digit references that introduce sapphire crystals, glossy dials, white gold surrounds, and Luminova compounds. Meanwhile, Patek Philippe transitioned from engraved enamel to printed dials. That said, many of these watches, like the Patek 3940 or 3970, might be classics even if they’re not fully vintage yet.More broadly, the 80s and 90s were defined by the widespread adoption of computers, CAD, and CNC, and watches produced using these tools can just feel different than what came before. These modern manufacturing techniques allow precision, which means tighter tolerances, more complications, and so on. Of course, future tech could do the same for future watches. In the process of modern turning into vintage, there’s an important “filtering” process as collectors, enthusiasts, and archivists decide what’s important. Anyone with an eye towards documenting, preserving, and defining that history can be a “collector.” It seems to take about 20 years (a generation) for this process to happen, and it’s no coincidence that there’s been a broader return to 1990s/early 2000s culture the past few years. It’s fascinating to watch it happen in real time as we have been with the neo-vintage era in watches. Some watches like the Breguet ref. 3350 tourbillon are deemed classics while many others wallow away in relative obscurity.Q: What really is a “Frankenstein” watch? Levels, types, and can any still be worthy of love? I ask because although swapping out a basic dial for one of a rarer model is obviously egregious, the rest, short of swapping out whole movements seems less obvious. In any proper service, parts will routinely need replacing, and hands are routinely replaced. So what is “all original”? Is there a normal amount of replacements where a watch is not Frankenstein or at least still a loveable one? –PaulA question that will be debated as long as we’re collecting watches or similar objects. In general, dial, case, and movement being born together is the most important inquiry, but even then, it gets tricky. In an article on restoration, I spoke with Eric Ku and Beau Goorey of LA Watch Works. Beau, LAWW’s watchmaker, said he doesn’t get hung up on replacing what he called “general wear items” like crowns or crystals, “as long as they’re genuine Rolex parts.” That’s a good guiding principle, though it gets tricky in the details. Omega and Universal Geneve collectors love to see the engraved logo on an original crystal. If you’re looking at First Series Rolex Daytona, you better know if it has the original millerighe pushers.Originality falls on a spectrum that looks something like this:* Original/factory. A watch as it originally left the factory. * Period correct. Non-original parts that are generally accepted as correct given a watch’s age. * OEM-authentic parts. Has different or service parts that come from the original manufacturer, but that would not have been seen on that particular watch as it left the factory.* Non-authentic parts. Not made by the original manufacturer.Most of us would probably draw the line for “Frankenwatch” somewhere in #3, but where exactly is personal. For example: * I recently wrote about those rare Universal Geneve grey prototype dials, which are generally believed to be loose dials placed in cases. Some of you thought it looked cool, others screamed Frankenwatch.* Earlier this year, we covered a Rolex Daytona 6240 with a white Paul Newman dial from Rolex CPO. It’s generally believe that dial isn’t period correct for this reference. It also had later pushers, crown, and bezel, even if they were all authentic service Rolex parts. Once a watch gets too many components that are either service parts or not correct, it can start to look like Frankenstein’s monster. Instead of just calling a something a Frankenwatch though, it is important to understand what components fall where on the spectrum, so you can decide if that matters to you. I generally believe that every watch has a price, but if it’s not put together correctly, a watch’s price may not be greater than the sum of its parts. Q: I’d love to know a bit more from behind the scenes of Unpolished: (1) Each newsletter, do you have a dedicated time to write everyday? Photography wise, how is the balance between getting the “ideal” shot IRL when the collector or brand is also present, in the sense of: should we chat or should I take pics? I imagine that scenario being quite tricky at events and releases in particular. –PauloTotally self-indulgent, but here we go. I work from home, and do my best writing first thing in the morning after walking the dog. I’ll often change locations in the afternoon, I like being in public where I feel like people are judging me if something’s on my screen that seems unproductive. The afternoon is often spent on more administrative tasks. I’d bet it takes three days to put together 2 newsletters/week. The rest of the week I work on bigger projects for the future, or for other publications and clients. (2) has changed a bit. Nowadays, Instagram emphasizes video so much, getting the best photo is less important than getting a short clip that can be used for a video when you’re in a pinch. So I emphasize trying to talk to people more now and make an actual connection. The newsletter also lends itself to this: I can get better newsletter content from a conversation if I ask interesting questions that no one else is, and sometimes I even like the “unpolished” feel of a mediocre photo in the newsletter. A newsletter is somewhere between a long email to friends and a short essay, and sometimes images can fit that brief, too. That said, sometimes I do care about the images, like last week’s visit to Glashütte. CLOSING THOUGHT👉 Dr. Helmut Crott was awarded the Gaïa Prize, an annual award honoring contributions in horology by the International Museum of Horology. From his acceptance: “My wish is that the watch industry learns to resist certain temptations inherent to the luxury sector—temptations that, in the pursuit of higher sales, blur the distinction between consumer products and exceptional objects.”Thanks for reading. Get in touch:* tony[at]unpolishedwatches.com* Instagram* Tap the heart or leave a comment: This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.unpolishedwatches.com/subscribe
    --------  
    22:23
  • How to Collect Neo-Vintage Watches (Ben, Watch Brothers London)
    Last week, I sat down for a fun chat with Ben Dunn of Watch Brothers London. Ben’s a U.K. dealer focusing on complicated neo-vintage watches from the 1980s–2000s. Our conversation comes in two parts: First, we talk about how Ben’s grown Watch Brothers London since he left Facebook to become a full-time dealer in 2022. Ben’s always transparent about his business and even shares some of his numbers, which I appreciate—he’s not one of those dealers playing the fake-it-till-you-make-it game. Then, we get nerdy about collecting neo-vintage watches. We talk Patek Philippe 3940, some of our other favorites—and least favorites—from the era, and how neo-vintage is different than other eras of collecting. Thanks to Ben for joining; follow him on Instagram or visit his website. Also s/o to Tim Vaux who takes the photos. Follow the podcast for future episodes: Spotify / Apple / RSS. Please subscribe to the feed because eventually I’ll stop sending out separate newsletters for episodes.To support the creation of more podcasts and access subscriber-only Q&A episodes, join Unpolished for $99/year or $9/mo:Show NotesIn-Depth: Blancpain’s Six MasterpiecesReference Talk: Patek Philippe Perpetual Calendar 3941The Three Dials of the Patek Philippe Perpetual Calendar 3940Instagram post by Ben showing various Patek 3940 dialsBen’s inventory we discuss:* Breguet Classique Tourbillon Skeleton 3355* Patek Philippe Second Series signed Beyer* Audemars Piguet Perpetual Calendar 25657 Mother-of-Pearl* Vacheron Constantin Perpetual Calendar with a sh*t ton of diamondsGet in touch:* tony[at]unpolishedwatches.com* Instagram* Or (my favorite), tap the heart, leave a comment, or send a message in the Substack app. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.unpolishedwatches.com/subscribe
    --------  
    54:40
  • A Chat with William Massena
    This week, I’m joined by William Massena. Over 30+ years, William has worn just about every hat in the industry: He was an early pioneer of online forums as a moderator on TimeZone, served as managing director at Antiquorum during the auction house’s heyday, and has long been a collector with an appreciation for both vintage and contemporary indies. In 2018, William founded Massena LAB, a creative studio for collaborations. His latest collab with Vianney Halter called the Old Soul uses vintage Minerva movements. We talk about what William’s collecting nowadays, the early days of watches on the internet, what’s changed most, whether there are too many brands, where Journe takes a sh*t, how to love watches and not brands, and then get into his latest collab with Vianney Halter (photos below). Thanks to William for joining. Learn more at Massena Lab. Follow the podcast here for future episodes: Spotify / Apple / RSS. Please subscribe to the feed because eventually I’ll stop sending out separate newsletters for episodes! To support the creation of more podcasts, and get access to subscriber-only Q&A episodes, join Unpolished for $99/year or $9/mo:Links:* The Watchmaking Journey of Vianney Halter, ACM* Talking Watches with William Massena, YouTube* The 1990s Minerva Pythagore, Unpolished* Full show notes: https://www.unpolishedwatches.com/p/in-conversation-with-william-massenaGet in touch:* [email protected]* Instagram* Or (my favorite), tap the heart, leave a comment, or send a message in the Substack app: This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.unpolishedwatches.com/subscribe
    --------  
    51:34
  • Indie Trends, Breguet, and a 2-Watch Collection for $50k
    We’re back with another audio chat, a podcast by any other name. This week, I’m joined by Brandon Moore, an editor at Watches by SJX based in Seattle. Brandon’s been an editor since 2018 and on forums longer than that. I particularly look to his opinions on independent and high-end watchmaking, but he’s got a keen eye and appreciation for watches of all kinds.We discuss trends in independent watch collecting, the interest in hand-finishing, Breguet’s 250th anniversary releases so far, Urban Jürgensen, the LVMH watch prize, and close by building two-watch collections with $50k from our favorite releases this year. Thanks for listening—I’ll do more regular chats throughout the rest of the year, so let me know what topics you’d like to hear more about. Follow the audio feed to get future episodes: Spotify / AppleTo support the creation of more podcasts, join Unpolished as a paid subscriber for $9/month or $99/year: Show Notes:* How Hand-finishing Became the New Complication, Unpolished* Movement Finishing in the Instagram Age, SJX* Breguet’s 2025 releases (all from SJX):* Up Close: Breguet Classique Souscription* Breguet’s Latest Type XX is Vintage-Inspired and No-Date* Breguet Introduces the Tradition Seconde Rétrograde 7035* Breguet Unveils First-Ever Flying Tourbillon with Tourbillon Sidéral* Insight: Breguet’s New Sympathique Clock and Natural Escapement* Ulysse Nardin Debuts Lightest Diver’s Watch, SJX* Watches Have a New Idea, and I Think I Like It, Unpolished* Editorial: Urban Jürgensen is Back, SJX* In-Depth: Rolex Land-Dweller, SJXFind Brandon on Watches by SJX or Instagram. P.S. We did get some intro music! ICYMIGet in touch:* [email protected]* Instagram* Or my favorite, tap the heart on this newsletter or leave a comment:* Or send a message via the Substack app: This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.unpolishedwatches.com/subscribe
    --------  
    52:13

Más podcasts de Arte

Acerca de Unpolished Watches

The companion podcast to Unpolished, the newsletter for watch collectors. Follow along for regular chats with collectors and enthusiasts. www.unpolishedwatches.com
Sitio web del podcast

Escucha Unpolished Watches, Audiolibro En Español y muchos más podcasts de todo el mundo con la aplicación de radio.es

Descarga la app gratuita: radio.es

  • Añadir radios y podcasts a favoritos
  • Transmisión por Wi-Fi y Bluetooth
  • Carplay & Android Auto compatible
  • Muchas otras funciones de la app

Unpolished Watches: Podcasts del grupo

Aplicaciones
Redes sociales
v7.23.9 | © 2007-2025 radio.de GmbH
Generated: 10/16/2025 - 2:51:42 PM